| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scott Ryder
Amarr
Suns Of Korhal
   |
Posted - 2009.06.18 20:39:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Scott Ryder on 18/06/2009 20:45:52
How much interest would a titan BPO copying operation give the investors?
110 days of copy time
Ill estimate 40 billion yearly profits (unless the market will get tighter, It is very likely that the titan bpc market will get tighter, if you want me to explain, I will)
And finally, you are handling alot public isk if im not mistaken. Will this Bpo be locked down with E-bank or something safe? You could get hit by a bus in the same way everyone else is at risk of getting hit by a bus.
|
Scott Ryder
Amarr
Suns Of Korhal
|
Posted - 2009.06.18 22:03:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Ji Sama
you can squezze 45B out of this yearly imo.
so that means it would take 1+ year to pay itself back.
not that bad imo..
If the current prices are stable or will rise youre statement is true.
I cant say they will drop further, but I am afraid they will.
|
Scott Ryder
Amarr
Suns Of Korhal
|
Posted - 2009.06.21 06:50:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Scott Ryder on 21/06/2009 06:51:23
Isnt 4 percent a bit low?
On 70 b that is 2.8 b per month. roughly half the profits.
Originally by: Cergorach
There are a lot of things CCP 'nerfed' that folks claimed would never be 'nerfed', things like ghost training and the price of a GTC ($). If previous 'nerfs' are any indication, how CCP sees things and how some of the player base see things aren't always compatible (what one finds acceptable, another might not). I'm not saying it's going to happen, but that it could happen.
We're not talking about a 'nerf to hell' scenario, but just enough 'nerf' to cause just enough folks do abandon the Titan bandwagon to create a little oversupply. You would be surprised how quickly a little oversupply can turn prices to crap. Often, with crap prices/oversupply you wait a while and maybe pick up a little cheap stock, waiting for the prices to return to 'normal'. While there are some folks who could afford to do that with Titan BPCs,this IPO isn't one of them.
Even if nerfed I dont see titan Bpcs dropping to more then 10 b a month. He can still repay his investors @ 4 percent interest
|
Scott Ryder
Amarr
Suns Of Korhal
|
Posted - 2009.06.21 08:10:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Bad Bobby
Originally by: Bad Bobby
I'll be buying the follwing BPOs in this order:
Leviathan (Caldari)
Erebus (Gallente)
Avatar (Amarr)
Ragnarok (Minmatar)
Having looked at various options, I'm inclined to fine tune the size of the 4 investment blocks as follows:
Block 1 = 70b (63b for Leviathan BPO and 7b for deathstar, fuel stockpile and war chest)
Block 2 = 66b (Erebus BPO)
Block 3 = 68b (Avatar BPO)
Block 4 = 61b (Ragnarok BPO)
Total = 265b
Slightly off topic, but what kinda return are we looking at?
|
Scott Ryder
Amarr
Suns Of Korhal
|
Posted - 2009.06.22 10:49:00 -
[5]
Originally by: fugazii
Originally by: Cergorach
Originally by: fugazii
Titans will never be nerfed more than they are currently. CCP would have trillions of isk to reimburse if they did.
Since when does CCP do reimbursements when they 'nerf' ships? Did they ever when they 'nerfed' other ships? By how much did demand drop for the Myrmidon after the shield 'nerf' or the drone bandwith 'nerf', now check the same for all the other 'nerfs'. Demand will often return, but it often takes months...
The only major ship nerf that has ever effected large amounts of investments by many people was the nano nerf, and yes CCP reimbursed your snake set.
There's a slight difference between nerfing shields on a 30m isk ship and nerfing a 80b isk ship.
No there isnt.
Stop talking about nerfing, lets call it rebalancing. Different aspects of the game will be rebalanced no mather if it costs 2 mil or 80 bill.
The pricetag shouldnt mather when it comes to balance |
| |
|